2 research outputs found
Dynamic real-time risk analytics of uncontrollable states in complex internet of things systems, cyber risk at the edge
The Internet of Things (IoT) triggers new types of cyber risks. Therefore,
the integration of new IoT devices and services requires a self-assessment of
IoT cyber security posture. By security posture this article refers to the
cybersecurity strength of an organisation to predict, prevent and respond to
cyberthreats. At present, there is a gap in the state of the art, because there
are no self-assessment methods for quantifying IoT cyber risk posture. To
address this gap, an empirical analysis is performed of 12 cyber risk
assessment approaches. The results and the main findings from the analysis is
presented as the current and a target risk state for IoT systems, followed by
conclusions and recommendations on a transformation roadmap, describing how IoT
systems can achieve the target state with a new goal-oriented dependency model.
By target state, we refer to the cyber security target that matches the generic
security requirements of an organisation. The research paper studies and adapts
four alternatives for IoT risk assessment and identifies the goal-oriented
dependency modelling as a dominant approach among the risk assessment models
studied. The new goal-oriented dependency model in this article enables the
assessment of uncontrollable risk states in complex IoT systems and can be used
for a quantitative self-assessment of IoT cyber risk posture
COVID-19 what have we learned? The rise of social machines and connected devices in pandemic management following the concepts of predictive, preventive and personalised medicine
A comprehensive bibliographic review with R statistical methods of the COVID
pandemic in PubMed literature and Web of Science Core Collection, supported
with Google Scholar search. In addition, a case study review of emerging new
approaches in different regions, using medical literature, academic literature,
news articles and other reliable data sources. Public responses of mistrust
about privacy data misuse differ across countries, depending on the chosen
public communication strategy